当前位置:首页 > 业务领域 > 污染检测 >

lols10外围投注-可口可乐 在外包策略上建立起来的含糖饮料帝国

编辑:lols10外围投注 来源:lols10外围投注 创发布时间:2021-04-21阅读43819次
  本文摘要:From the very beginning, Coca-Cola had a drug problem.可口可乐问世源自一个药物问题。

From the very beginning, Coca-Cola had a drug problem.可口可乐问世源自一个药物问题。The brand’s founder, Atlanta pharmacist John Stith Pemberton, was addicted to morphine, a narcotic many suspected Pemberton began using after suffering a series of debilitating wounds while defending the city of Columbus, Georgia, during the Civil War. By the 1880s, Pemberton was not well, and he was also hurting financially. In 1872, Pemberton filed for bankruptcy and a few years later watched helplessly when two fires ravaged his Atlanta business. In 1886, he had finally clawed his way out of debt but was still strapped for cash.可口可乐(Coca-Cola)品牌的创始人是亚特兰大药剂师约翰o彭伯顿。



1886年,他再一挣脱债务缠身的窘境,但是手头仍然没钱。That was the year Pemberton introduced Atlanta to Coca-Cola. Pemberton patterned his drink after a French patent medicine called Vin Mariani, a Bordeaux wine mixed with coca leaves, which had become quite popular in international markets by the end of the 1870s, and why not? Here was a drink that was essentially cocaine-laced wine, inducing quite a buzz for the habitual consumer. All sorts of luminaries testified to its restorative properties, including U.S. President Ulysses S. Grant and Pope Leo XIII.就在这一年,彭伯顿在亚特兰大发售了可口可乐。19世纪70年代末,一种叫作Vin Mariani的法国专利药物在国际市场十分最畅销,这种药是由混合了古柯树叶的波尔多葡萄酒做成。


Cash-poor Pemberton believed it made smart business sense to create a knockoff of this popular beverage, which is exactly what he did, selling his own French Wine of Coca in 1885. The problem was, Protestant clamoring for prohibition led to citywide restrictions on alcohol consumption in Atlanta, forcing Pemberton to replace the wine with carbonated water. Thus, Coca-Cola became a kind of temperance drink in 1886.为钱所困的彭伯顿看见了商机,指出仿造这款热门饮料一定是个不俗的做生意。而他真为就这么做到了,1885年,他开始贩卖自己的饮料品牌:法国古柯葡萄酒(French Wine of Coca)。但是问题是,当时的清教徒敦促禁酒令,造成亚特兰大全城实行禁酒令,于是彭伯顿被迫将葡萄酒替换成汽水。

于是在1886年,就有了这种无酒精饮料可口可乐。The decision to switch to water was more than just an expedient solution to a prohibition problem: it allowed Pemberton to outsource roughly 80% of his product’s volume onto others. That’s because it was soda fountain operators who mixed the water—at least five ounces per one ounce of syrup—into Pemberton’s finished beverages. All Pemberton sold was a dark, syrupy concentrate, which allowed him to save enormous amounts of money on transportation costs. Of course, the soda fountain water ultimately came from the municipal tap.替换成汽水某种程度是应付禁酒令的权宜之计,这也让彭伯顿以求将大约80%的产品生产外包过来。冷饮店的经营者们必须做到的,意味着是按一定比例将水兑入彭伯顿做成的饮料(最少五盎司水币值一盎司糖浆)。

如此一来,彭伯顿出售的就只是黑色的稀释糖浆,从而可以节省大笔运输费用。当然,冷饮店冰柜里的水就是自来水。This model continued under Pemberton’s successor, Atlanta pharmacist Asa Candler, who signed the first bottling franchise contracts for Coca-Cola in 1899. Initially hesitant to approve this distribution method—considering the rudimentary nature of most bottling operations at the time—Candler came to see that bottling enabled Coke to reach rural markets far removed from city centers. What made the deal even sweeter was the fact that independent businessmen in small towns covered the tab for this expansion. Bottlers fronted the capital to buy the machinery, packaging, and municipal water, as well as the trucks and tires that spread Coke’s syrup through the nation’s commercial arteries.1899年,亚特兰大药剂师艾萨o钱德勒与可口可乐签定了首份装瓶许可合约,并接管公司,之后延用了这种经营模式。


But Coke’s outsourcing strategy didn’t stop there. On the supply side, Coke also shunned ownership of factories and plants. The company did not own sugar plantations in the Caribbean, high-fructose corn syrup wet mills in the Midwest, or decaffeination facilities in the Southeast. Rather, the company relied on a host of independent businesses—the Monsanto Chemical Company, Cargill, Hershey Chocolate Company, among many others—to mine, process, and refine the critical ingredients that went into its finished beverages. In short, Coke was averse to vertical business integration, and instead acted as a kind of commodity broker, making money by transferring materials from independently owned producers and distributors.然而,可口可乐的外包战略并没早已负于。在供应方面,可口可乐还尽量避免持有人工厂和厂房。

比如,该公司既没在加勒比海享有糖种植园,或在中西部持有人低果糖玉米糖浆的湿磨厂,也没在东南部持有人干咖啡因的设施。忽略,公司倚赖大量独立国家的企业,如孟山都化学公司(Monsanto Chemical Company)、嘉吉公司(Cargill)、好时公司(Hershey Chocolate Company)等等,来对成品饮料中的关键成分展开开采、加工和萃取。

总之,可口可乐不讨厌横向的业务统合,而是作为某种商品经纪人,通过在独立国家经营的生产商和分销商之间传输材料来赚。I call this money-making approach Coca-Cola capitalism. Coke followed this path throughout the 20th century. It involved getting others, whether it was government-owned water works or vertically integrated sugar refineries, to invest in the production and distribution systems needed to turn the “Real Thing” into a real thing. What made Coke great, in other words, was not really what it did, but what it didn’t do. It proved incredibly adept at getting independent businesses and local governments to bear the majority of the costs of producing and distributing its products.我将这种赚之道称作“可口可乐资本主义”。整个20世纪,可口可乐都是这么做到的。


它让其他人,不论是政府的自来水厂还是横向统合的炼糖厂,都投入生产和分销系统,共同完成“Real Thing(真家伙)”(来自可口可乐的广告语)的生产。换言之,确实让可口可乐沦为一家最出色企业的,不是它做到了什么,而是它没做到什么。事实证明,可口可乐长袖善舞,善于调动其他企业和当地政府,为其分担产品的大部分生产和分销成本。

Take municipal recycling systems. Here was a publicly financed program that helped soft drink companies expand their productive capacity on the taxpayer’s dime. Once again, Coke did little of the work, letting municipalities and private citizens invest in elaborate reclamation infrastructure in the 1980s and 1990s that conveniently brought copious quantities of packaging materials back to local centers near its corporate distributors. Rather than having to pay for the waste they produced, Coca-Cola received a kind of public subsidy that in the long run enabled them to continue to produce tremendous quantities of one-way, throwaway containers (72% of which, in the case of plastic PET containers, ends up in American landfills today). As it had with public water supplies, the company was simply tapping into another municipal stream, only this one contained packaging materials, not water.以城市再行循环系统为事例,这是一个由纳税人出资协助软饮料公司不断扩大生产力的公共资助计划。20世纪八九十年代,可口可乐又一次不费吹灰之力,让市政府和市民出资修筑了精美的重复使用基础设施,让大批包装材料可以十分便捷地返回公司分销商附近的当地重复使用中心。可口可乐公司不但没为其生产的垃圾缴纳任何费用,甚至还享用了一项政府补贴,这项补贴从将来上协助其大大生产数量极大的重复使用饮料包装(其中72%是PET塑料瓶,它们现在都躺在了美国的垃圾填埋场)。

于是除了公共用水外,可口可乐公司动用了又一项公共资源,只不过这次不是水,而是包装材料。Coca-Cola has not been the only company to follow this path to big profits. Software firms, such as Microsoft MSFT -0.25% , have made tremendous revenues selling its Office suite, relying on other businesses to produce expensive hardware that can turn Microsoft’s code into consumable products. You can find an extreme version of Coca-Cola capitalism on Wall Street, where brokers do not manage any kind production or distribution infrastructure but instead make money off transaction fees as commodities flow from one buyer to another.用这种方法攫取暴利的好比可口可乐一家。


In short, Coca-Cola KO 0.36% capitalism has become the model for some of the most profitable firms of our time. This is what 21st century capitalism rewards.简而言之,可口可乐资本主义早已沦为这个时代最赚的一类企业模式。这就是21世纪资本主义的报酬。But the question remains: does this system benefit the public at large? The history of Coca-Cola reveals that the firm demands a great deal of public resources—recycling systems, subsidized municipal water, corn subsidies, etc.—and it is not at all clear that Coke transforms these investments into goods that serve the interests of the nation (do we really need more sugar water in a country in which over 30% of the population is obese?).但是问题仍然不存在:这个系统能否惠及广大民众?可口可乐的发展史表明,该企业对公共资源的市场需求很大,例如重复使用系统、补贴性城市用水、玉米补贴等等,可口可乐公司把这些投资变为商品,但是我们却显然不确切这否利国利民(在一个体重增加人口多达总人口30%的国家,我们知道必须更加多汽水么?)。While Coca-Cola is shifting towards healthier drink options, especially bottled water, the price for providing this service should appear unconscionable to the informed consumer. Americans pay more than $4 for a gallon of Dasani water when they could easily enjoy the same quantity of clean water from their tap for a fraction of a cent. Perhaps our money could be better spent fixing public water systems—which currently need over $500 billion in repairs, according to the EPA—rather than purchasing Coke’s bottled water. After all, as Coke’s history makes clear, private citizens and Coca-Cola need public pipes to survive.虽然可口可乐开始发售更加身体健康的饮品自由选择,特别是在是瓶装水,但是对于明智的消费者来说,其价格并不合理。






Copyright © 2010-2014 泰州市lols10外围押注有限公司 版权所有  苏ICP备75219885号-1